[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f54e9c30-b483-4dae-9b22-24feb4fc289e@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 13:28:52 +0000
From: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
To: Jason Yan <yanaijie@...wei.com>, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, chenxiang66@...ilicon.com,
jinpu.wang@...ud.ionos.com, artur.paszkiewicz@...el.com,
dlemoal@...nel.org, ipylypiv@...gle.com
Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] scsi: mvsas: Use LIBSAS_SHT_BASE
On 05/03/2024 13:19, Jason Yan wrote:
>> - .ioctl = sas_ioctl,
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
>> - .compat_ioctl = sas_ioctl,
>> -#endif
>> .shost_groups = mvst_host_groups,
>> .sdev_groups = mvst_sdev_groups,
>> .track_queue_depth = 1,
>>
>
> Doesn't hvae ->eh_abort_handler too.
Is setting eh_abort_handler actually really ever required for libsas
drivers? We have sas_eh_abort_handler, so I assume so..
Thanks,
John
Powered by blists - more mailing lists