[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0fad2eb5-34cd-4928-9e54-104c77de1424@broadcom.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 10:13:43 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>
To: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>, AceLan Kao <acelan.kao@...onical.com>,
Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>,
Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Kamal Dasu <kamal.dasu@...adcom.com>,
Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>,
Mario Kicherer <dev@...herer.org>, Chuanhong Guo <gch981213@...il.com>,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] spi: Unify error codes by replacing -ENOTSUPP with
-EOPNOTSUPP
On 3/13/24 08:56, Michael Walle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just had a quick look to see where Florians breakage could come
> from and just noticed this:
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c
>> index 849ccfedbc72..e0b6715e5dfe 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c
>> @@ -974,7 +974,7 @@ static int spinand_manufacturer_match(struct spinand_device *spinand,
>> spinand->manufacturer = manufacturer;
>> return 0;
>> }
>> - return -ENOTSUPP;
>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> }
>>
>> static int spinand_id_detect(struct spinand_device *spinand)
>
> This seems to be random as no other spi-nand ENOTSUPP was converted
> but just this. Is there a reason for this, AceLan?
FWIW, we do not have any SPI-NAND flashes on those boards only SPI-NOR,
just posted a fix for this:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240313171050.3505620-1-florian.fainelli@broadcom.com
--
Florian
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (4221 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists