lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 10:13:43 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>
To: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>, AceLan Kao <acelan.kao@...onical.com>,
 Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>,
 Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>,
 Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
 Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
 Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
 Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
 Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Kamal Dasu <kamal.dasu@...adcom.com>,
 Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>,
 Mario Kicherer <dev@...herer.org>, Chuanhong Guo <gch981213@...il.com>,
 linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] spi: Unify error codes by replacing -ENOTSUPP with
 -EOPNOTSUPP

On 3/13/24 08:56, Michael Walle wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I just had a quick look to see where Florians breakage could come
> from and just noticed this:
> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c
>> index 849ccfedbc72..e0b6715e5dfe 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c
>> @@ -974,7 +974,7 @@ static int spinand_manufacturer_match(struct spinand_device *spinand,
>>   		spinand->manufacturer = manufacturer;
>>   		return 0;
>>   	}
>> -	return -ENOTSUPP;
>> +	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>   }
>>   
>>   static int spinand_id_detect(struct spinand_device *spinand)
> 
> This seems to be random as no other spi-nand ENOTSUPP was converted
> but just this. Is there a reason for this, AceLan?

FWIW, we do not have any SPI-NAND flashes on those boards only SPI-NOR, 
just posted a fix for this:

https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240313171050.3505620-1-florian.fainelli@broadcom.com
-- 
Florian


Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (4221 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ