[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <529774b9-20be-485d-b218-2452ce536770@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 14:45:47 +0300
From: Maxim Korotkov <korotkov.maxim.s@...il.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc: Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@...nel.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Hector Palacios <hector.palacios@...i.com>, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lvc-project@...uxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: hynix: fixed typo
Hi,
On 15.03.2024 14:23, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Isn't it done like that on purpose? Read-retry is not a mandatory
> feature.
Works it as designed? I'm not sure about it.
I wouldn't rule it out, but it's a little weird that the
hynix_nand_rr_init() function
is used as if it can return an error but never returns.
Probably checking of value returned from hynix_nand_rr_init()
should be removed in hynix_nand_init()
Best regards, Max
Powered by blists - more mailing lists