linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: nvmem: Remove fsl,t1023-sfp in favor of fsl,layerscape-sfp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240317211257.GA2317294-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 16:12:57 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...ux.dev>
Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
	Richard Alpe <richard@...42.se>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@...natech.se>,
	Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: nvmem: Remove fsl,t1023-sfp in favor of
 fsl,layerscape-sfp

On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 08:20:25PM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
> These bindings document the same hardware (just different minor
> revisions). Remove the newer fsl,t1023-sfp.
> 
> Fixes: aa1ed6047107 ("dt-bindings: nvmem: Add t1023-sfp efuse support")

I don't think Fixes is appropriate here. What was broken?

> Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...ux.dev>
> ---
> 
>  .../bindings/nvmem/fsl,layerscape-sfp.yaml    | 21 ++++++++++-
>  .../bindings/nvmem/fsl,t1023-sfp.yaml         | 37 -------------------
>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/fsl,t1023-sfp.yaml

Otherwise,

Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>