linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: nvmem: Remove fsl,t1023-sfp in favor of fsl,layerscape-sfp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ea71226f785752be26258fb4e47def1c@bit42.se>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 09:16:18 +0100
From: richard@...42.se
To: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...ux.dev>
Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>, Rob Herring
 <robh@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@...natech.se>, Michael Walle
 <michael@...le.cc>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Conor
 Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
 <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: nvmem: Remove fsl,t1023-sfp in favor of
 fsl,layerscape-sfp

On 2024-03-17 22:12, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 08:20:25PM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
>> These bindings document the same hardware (just different minor
>> revisions). Remove the newer fsl,t1023-sfp.
>> 
>> Fixes: aa1ed6047107 ("dt-bindings: nvmem: Add t1023-sfp efuse 
>> support")
> 
> I don't think Fixes is appropriate here. What was broken?
I also don't think Fixes is appropriate. Apart from that:

Acked-by: Richard Alpe <richard@...42.se>