linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] rpmb: add Replay Protected Memory Block (RPMB) subsystem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 10:54:03 +0200
From: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, 
	op-tee@...ts.trustedfirmware.org, 
	Shyam Saini <shyamsaini@...ux.microsoft.com>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, 
	Jerome Forissier <jerome.forissier@...aro.org>, Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>, 
	Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>, 
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, 
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>, 
	Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] rpmb: add Replay Protected Memory Block (RPMB) subsystem

On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 1:24 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Jens,
>
> thanks for your patch!
>
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 4:31 PM Jens Wiklander
> <jens.wiklander@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> > A number of storage technologies support a specialised hardware
> > partition designed to be resistant to replay attacks. The underlying
> > HW protocols differ but the operations are common. The RPMB partition
> > cannot be accessed via standard block layer, but by a set of specific
> > RPMB commands: WRITE, READ, GET_WRITE_COUNTER, and PROGRAM_KEY. Such a
> > partition provides authenticated and replay protected access, hence
> > suitable as a secure storage.
> >
> > The initial aim of this patch is to provide a simple RPMB driver
> > interface which can be accessed by the optee driver to facilitate early
> > RPMB access to OP-TEE OS (secure OS) during the boot time.
> >
> > A TEE device driver can claim the RPMB interface, for example, via
> > rpmb_interface_register() or rpmb_dev_find_device(). The RPMB driver
> > provides a callback to route RPMB frames to the RPMB device accessible
> > via rpmb_route_frames().
> >
> > The detailed operation of implementing the access is left to the TEE
> > device driver itself.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@...aro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Shyam Saini <shyamsaini@...ux.microsoft.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>
>
> I would mention in the commit that the subsystem is currently
> only used with eMMC but is designed to be used also by UFS
> and NVME. Nevertheless, no big deal so:
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>
> > +config RPMB
> > +       tristate "RPMB partition interface"
> > +       depends on MMC
>
> depends on MMC || SCSI_UFSHCD || NVME_CORE
> ?
>
> Or do we want to hold it off until we implement the backends?

Correct, I think we should hold it off until then.

Thanks,
Jens

>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij