[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOg9mSSMAao4WpZWmVhsqLwsn=sfs05XPVuHMdjH0wUyWET_WQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 12:26:12 -0400
From: Mike Marshall <hubcap@...ibond.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Martin Brandenburg <martin@...ibond.com>, devel@...ts.orangefs.org,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mike Marshall <hubcap@...ibond.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] orangefs: fix out-of-bounds fsid access
I applied Arnd's patch on top of Linux 6.9-rc3 and
ran through xfstests with no issue.
Also, instead of Arnd's patch, I used Jan's idea:
+
+ buf->f_fsid.val[0] = ORANGEFS_SB(sb)->fs_id;
+ buf->f_fsid.val[1] = ORANGEFS_SB(sb)->id;
+
And ran that through as well, no issue.
Sorry for missing the earlier patch.
-Mike
On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 1:55 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2024, at 23:21, Justin Stitt wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 7:36 AM Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> wrote:
> >> Frankly, this initializer is hard to understand for me. Why not simple:
> >>
> >> buf->f_fsid[0] = ORANGEFS_SB(sb)->fs_id;
> >> buf->f_fsid[1] = ORANGEFS_SB(sb)->id;
> >>
> >
> > +1 for this idea, seems easier to read for me.
>
> Yes, good idea, I'll send this as v2 after my next round
> of build testing.
>
> Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists