[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <36c6bdd3-b010-4b58-b358-395462d8765b@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 20:08:07 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>, Alexander Gordeev
<agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>, Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] s390/hugetlb: convert PG_arch_1 code to work on
folio->flags
On 07.05.24 18:33, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 16:21:20 +0200
> David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>> Let's make it clearer that we are always working on folio flags and
>> never page flags of tail pages.
>
> please be a little more verbose, and explain what you are doing (i.e.
> converting usages of page flags to folio flags), not just why.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
>
> with a few extra words in the description:
Let's make it clearer that we are always working on folio flags and
never page flags of tail pages by converting remaining PG_arch_1 users
that modify page->flags to modify folio->flags instead.
No functional change intended, because we would always have worked with
the head page (where page->flags corresponds to folio->flags) and never
with tail pages.
>
> Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
Thanks for all the review!
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists