[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240512180044.76086-1-sj@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 12 May 2024 11:00:44 -0700
From: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
To: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
Cc: Honggyu Kim <honggyu.kim@...com>,
damon@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
apopple@...dia.com,
baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com,
dave.jiang@...el.com,
hyeongtak.ji@...com,
kernel_team@...ynix.com,
linmiaohe@...wei.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
mhiramat@...nel.org,
rakie.kim@...com,
rostedt@...dmis.org,
surenb@...gle.com,
yangx.jy@...itsu.com,
ying.huang@...el.com,
ziy@...dia.com,
42.hyeyoo@...il.com,
art.jeongseob@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/7] mm/damon/paddr: refactor DAMOS_PAGEOUT with migration_mode
On Sat, 11 May 2024 13:16:17 -0700 SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 12:19:07 -0700 SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 15:08:50 +0900 Honggyu Kim <honggyu.kim@...com> wrote:
> >
> > > This is a preparation patch that introduces migration modes.
> > >
> > > The damon_pa_pageout is renamed to damon_pa_migrate and it receives an
> > > extra argument for migration_mode.
> >
> > I personally think keeping damon_pa_pageout() as is and adding a new function
> > (damon_pa_migrate()) with some duplicated code is also ok, but this approach
> > also looks fine to me. So I have no strong opinion here, but just letting you
> > know I would have no objection at both approaches.
>
> Meanwhile, we added one more logic in damon_pa_pageout() for doing page
> idleness double check on its own[1]. It makes reusing damon_pa_pageout() for
> multiple reason a bit complex. I think the complexity added a problem in this
> patch that I also missed before due to the complexity. Show below comment in
> line. Hence now I think it would be better to do the suggested way.
>
> If we use the approach, this patch is no more necessary, and therefore can be
> dropped.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/20240426195247.100306-1-sj@kernel.org
I updated this patchset to address comments on this thread, and posted it as
RFC patchset v4 on behalf of Honggyu under his approval:
https://lore.kernel.org/20240512175447.75943-1-sj@kernel.org
Thanks,
SJ
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists