linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] Use BPF filters for a "perf top -u" workaround

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAP-5=fW8TA0KQOepQRuC_0mhyp6kHbPodh+6-uoVxsmC=09tTw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 22:04:43 -0700
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, 
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, 
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, 
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, 
	Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, 
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, Changbin Du <changbin.du@...wei.com>, 
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, 
	linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] Use BPF filters for a "perf top -u" workaround

On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 9:20 PM Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Allow uid and gid to be terms in BPF filters by first breaking the
> connection between filter terms and PERF_SAMPLE_xx values. Calculate
> the uid and gid using the bpf_get_current_uid_gid helper, rather than
> from a value in the sample. Allow filters to be passed to perf top, this allows:
>
> $ perf top -e cycles:P --filter "uid == $(id -u)"
>
> to work as a "perf top -u" workaround, as "perf top -u" usually fails
> due to processes/threads terminating between the /proc scan and the
> perf_event_open.

Fwiw, something I noticed playing around with this (my workload was
`perf test -w noploop 100000` as different users) is that old samples
appeared to linger around making terminated processes still appear in
the top list. My guess is that there aren't other samples showing up
and pushing the old sample events out of the ring buffers due to the
filter. This can look quite odd and I don't know if we have a way to
improve upon it, flush the ring buffers, histograms, etc. It appears
to be a latent `perf top` issue that you could encounter on other low
frequency events, but I thought I'd mention it anyway.

Thanks,
Ian

> Ian Rogers (3):
>   perf bpf filter: Give terms their own enum
>   perf bpf filter: Add uid and gid terms
>   perf top: Allow filters on events
>
>  tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt     |  2 +-
>  tools/perf/Documentation/perf-top.txt        |  4 ++
>  tools/perf/builtin-top.c                     |  9 +++
>  tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.c                 | 55 ++++++++++++----
>  tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.h                 |  5 +-
>  tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.l                 | 66 +++++++++----------
>  tools/perf/util/bpf-filter.y                 |  7 +-
>  tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample-filter.h     | 27 +++++++-
>  tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/sample_filter.bpf.c | 67 +++++++++++++++-----
>  9 files changed, 172 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.45.0.rc1.225.g2a3ae87e7f-goog
>