[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zk9aUtGmeMN04+nD@e133380.arm.com>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 16:01:38 +0100
From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>, Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@....com>,
shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com,
D Scott Phillips OS <scott@...amperecomputing.com>,
carl@...amperecomputing.com, lcherian@...vell.com,
bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com,
"Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)" <tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>,
baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>,
Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Peter Newman <peternewman@...gle.com>, dfustini@...libre.com,
amitsinght@...vell.com, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Rex Nie <rex.nie@...uarmicro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/35] x86/resctrl: Move the resctrl filesystem code
to /fs/resctrl
Hi Reinette,
Apologies for the slow response...
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 08:56:41AM -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> On 5/14/2024 8:17 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
> > On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 08:41:37AM -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> >> On 4/26/2024 8:05 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
> >>> This is a respin of the resctrl refactoring series described below,
> >>> addressing review feedback. Many thanks to those to responded with
> >>> feedback on the v1 series [2].
> >>>
> >>> See Notes and FYIs in the individual patches for details on the changes
> >>> and outstanding issues.
> >>
> >> What are your expectations regarding this series while considering [1] and [2]?
> >>
> >> Reinette
> >>
> >> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZiE8%2foXyjBef2qTy@e133380.arm.com/
> >> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/acce93e6-4c8e-472d-a2bc-5cbad2950661@intel.com/
> >>
> >
> > I plan to propose a reworked version of the fflags and string parser
> > stuff, and take a look at the other more minor outstanding issues.
> >
> > The series does need rebasing, but otherwise I don't anticipate much
> > change to the code from the Arm side unless there are further review
> > comments.
> >
> > Do you have a preference on how this series should proceed?
>
> I believe that I already answered this question in [2], hence my confusion
> about this posting.
>
> Reinette
I guess James and I need to tidy up the loose ends and repost this.
I'm hoping we can get a v3 out over the next few weeks or so.
Cheers
---Dave
Powered by blists - more mailing lists