linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/35] x86/resctrl: Move the resctrl filesystem code to /fs/resctrl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8387d2d8-921a-4992-b622-15ddd89bf8d3@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 17:07:50 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
 Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 James Morse <james.morse@....com>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
 Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
 Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@....com>, shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com,
 D Scott Phillips OS <scott@...amperecomputing.com>,
 carl@...amperecomputing.com, lcherian@...vell.com,
 bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com, "Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)"
 <tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>, baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com,
 Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>, Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>,
 Peter Newman <peternewman@...gle.com>, dfustini@...libre.com,
 amitsinght@...vell.com, Rex Nie <rex.nie@...uarmicro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/35] x86/resctrl: Move the resctrl filesystem code to
 /fs/resctrl

On 23.05.24 17:01, Dave Martin wrote:
> Hi Reinette,
> 
> Apologies for the slow response...
> 
> On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 08:56:41AM -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote:
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> On 5/14/2024 8:17 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 08:41:37AM -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote:
>>>> On 4/26/2024 8:05 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
>>>>> This is a respin of the resctrl refactoring series described below,
>>>>> addressing review feedback.  Many thanks to those to responded with
>>>>> feedback on the v1 series [2].
>>>>>
>>>>> See Notes and FYIs in the individual patches for details on the changes
>>>>> and outstanding issues.
>>>>
>>>> What are your expectations regarding this series while considering [1] and [2]?
>>>>
>>>> Reinette
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZiE8%2foXyjBef2qTy@e133380.arm.com/
>>>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/acce93e6-4c8e-472d-a2bc-5cbad2950661@intel.com/
>>>>
>>>
>>> I plan to propose a reworked version of the fflags and string parser
>>> stuff, and take a look at the other more minor outstanding issues.
>>>
>>> The series does need rebasing, but otherwise I don't anticipate much
>>> change to the code from the Arm side unless there are further review
>>> comments.
>>>
>>> Do you have a preference on how this series should proceed?
>>
>> I believe that I already answered this question in [2], hence my confusion
>> about this posting.
>>
>> Reinette
> 
> I guess James and I need to tidy up the loose ends and repost this.
> 
> I'm hoping we can get a v3 out over the next few weeks or so.

Finally having more time to review this (I hope ...) does it make sense 
to review this v2 or wait for v3?

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb