linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sysfs: Add stub sysfs_bin_attr_simple_read() for !CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240603221507.GC19897@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 19:15:07 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	patches@...ts.linux.dev,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysfs: Add stub sysfs_bin_attr_simple_read() for
 !CONFIG_SYSFS

On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 10:46:34PM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 02:30:45PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > Since the only declaration for sysfs_bin_attr_simple_read() is inside the
> > "#ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS". Add a stub to the #else section too.
> [...]
> > I don't see a patch for this yet, but I did find a 0-day robot complaint:
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/202404200345.eGdn5uxW-lkp@intel.com/
> 
> I already submitted a patch on May 23, but it hasn't been applied yet:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/05f4290439a58730738a15b0c99cd8576c4aa0d9.1716461752.git.lukas@wunner.de/

Ah, it is not a good practice to put patches you want applied buried
in a thread, that is perhaps why it has been overlooked..

> (My patch returns 0, yours -EINVAL, but I don't think that matters.)

Yes, it looks like the function will never be called.

Jason