[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2024061006-overdress-outburst-36ae@gregkh>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 08:28:29 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Ron Economos <re@...z.net>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, jonathanh@...dia.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org,
allen.lkml@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/741] 6.6.33-rc2 review
On Sun, Jun 09, 2024 at 11:21:55PM -0700, Ron Economos wrote:
> On 6/9/24 12:34 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.33 release.
> > > There are 741 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > 6.6 seems to have build problem on risc-v:
> >
> > CC kernel/locking/qrwlock.o
> > 690
> > CC lib/bug.o
> > 691
> > CC block/blk-rq-qos.o
> > 692
> > arch/riscv/kernel/suspend.c: In function 'suspend_save_csrs':
> > 693
> > arch/riscv/kernel/suspend.c:14:66: error: 'RISCV_ISA_EXT_XLINUXENVCFG' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIFENCEI'?
> > 694
> > 14 | if (riscv_cpu_has_extension_unlikely(smp_processor_id(), RISCV_ISA_EXT_XLINUXENVCFG))
> > 695
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > 696
> > | RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIFENCEI
> > 697
> > arch/riscv/kernel/suspend.c:14:66: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> > 698
> > CC io_uring/io-wq.o
> > 699
> > arch/riscv/kernel/suspend.c: In function 'suspend_restore_csrs':
> > 700
> > arch/riscv/kernel/suspend.c:37:66: error: 'RISCV_ISA_EXT_XLINUXENVCFG' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIFENCEI'?
> > 701
> > 37 | if (riscv_cpu_has_extension_unlikely(smp_processor_id(), RISCV_ISA_EXT_XLINUXENVCFG))
> > 702
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > 703
> > | RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIFENCEI
> > 704
> > make[4]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:243: arch/riscv/kernel/suspend.o] Error 1
> > 705
> > make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:480: arch/riscv/kernel] Error 2
> > 706
> > make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:480: arch/riscv] Error 2
> > 707
> > make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> > 708
> > CC lib/buildid.o
> > 709
> >
> > https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/jobs/7053222239
> > https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/pipelines/1324369118
> >
> > No problems detected on 6.8-stable and 6.1-stable.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Pavel
>
> I'm seeing the same thing here. Somehow some extra patches got slipped in
> between rc1 and rc2. The new patches for RISC-V are:
>
> Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>
> riscv: Save/restore envcfg CSR during CPU suspend
>
> commit 88b55a586b87994a33e0285c9e8881485e9b77ea
>
> Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>
> riscv: Fix enabling cbo.zero when running in M-mode
>
> commit 8c6e096cf527d65e693bfbf00aa6791149c58552
>
> The first patch "riscv: Save/restore envcfg CSR during CPU suspend" causes
> the build failure.
>
>
Yes, these were added because they were marked as fixes for other
commits in the series. I'll unwind them all now as something is going
wrong...
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists