lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <jsyf5islonamw76iulcvpzuoqjzbfo5uwehcscggkimhd6u4sw@kik5u3dv42tm>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 16:59:22 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>, 
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>, 
	Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: really skip LONG_LINE_* when LONG_LINE is
 ignored


> I don't know if the change in logic is correct, but if it is, you
> probably want to remove one set of parentheses:
> A && (B && C) => A && B && C

Oh, true, thanks!


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ