lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240612152510.GE1504919@google.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 16:25:10 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
	Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
	Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
	Ryan Walklin <ryan@...ttoast.com>,
	Chris Morgan <macroalpha82@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] mfd: axp20x: AXP717: Fix missing IRQ status
 registers range

On Wed, 12 Jun 2024, Andre Przywara wrote:

> Hi Lee,
> 
> On 02/05/2024 10:39, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Apr 2024, Andre Przywara wrote:
> > 
> > > While we list the "IRQ status *and acknowledge*" registers as volatile,
> > > they are missing from the writable range array, so acknowledging any
> > > interrupts was met with an -EIO error.
> > > 
> > > Add the five registers that hold those bits to the writable array.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: b5bfc8ab2484 ("mfd: axp20x: Add support for AXP717 PMIC")
> > > Reported-by: Chris Morgan <macromorgan@...mail.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/mfd/axp20x.c | 1 +
> > >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
> 
> Can you please take just this patch as a fix for 6.10? This fixes the power
> key operation.
> This applies cleanly on top of v6.10-rc3, so there is no need for any extra
> immutable branch or coordination with regulator.
> (The same is true independently for patch 2/5, on the regulator side).

What does the Fixes: commit break?

Or is it the case that it never worked properly?

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ