[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABQX2QNT+rDC3M7UPWwT_XRb8iXiihk4iczfcO9iokUFhn0DJw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 09:47:12 -0400
From: Zack Rusin <zack.rusin@...adcom.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Alexey Makhalov <alexey.makhalov@...adcom.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, lkp@...el.com,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, jic23@...nel.org,
lars@...afoo.de, nuno.sa@...log.com, dragos.bogdan@...log.com,
anshulusr@...il.com, andrea.collamati@...il.com,
oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/vmwgfx: Fix missing HYPERVISOR_GUEST dependency
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 6:02 AM Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 11:07:09AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 15, 2024 at 06:25:10PM -0700, Alexey Makhalov wrote:
> > > VMWARE_HYPERCALL alternative will not work as intended without
> > > VMware guest code initialization.
> > >
> > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> > > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202406152104.FxakP1MB-lkp@intel.com/
> > > Signed-off-by: Alexey Makhalov <alexey.makhalov@...adcom.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/Kconfig | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/Kconfig
> > > index faddae3d6ac2..6f1ac940cbae 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/Kconfig
> > > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
> > > config DRM_VMWGFX
> > > tristate "DRM driver for VMware Virtual GPU"
> > > depends on DRM && PCI && MMU
> > > - depends on X86 || ARM64
> > > + depends on (X86 && HYPERVISOR_GUEST) || ARM64
> > > select DRM_TTM
> > > select DRM_TTM_HELPER
> > > select MAPPING_DIRTY_HELPERS
> > > --
> >
> > Right, I'll queue this soon but it doesn't reproduce here with gcc-11 or gcc-13.
> > This must be something gcc-9 specific or so...
>
> Actually, that's a DRM patch.
>
> Folks in To: ok to carry this though the tip tree?
That's fine with me. Thanks.
z
Powered by blists - more mailing lists