[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eewxzrpcvwodj2ntiopezcjud6hj4fhi3ct7w3tdrin3ds3jhb@evuaplkq3477>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 11:00:55 -0500
From: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sa8775p-ride: support both board
variants
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 09:07:05AM GMT, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 8:50 PM Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 6/19/24 20:32, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
> > >
> > > Split the current .dts into two: the existing one keeps the name and
> > > supports revision 2 of the board while patch 2 adds a .dts for revision 3.
> >
> > Are both gonna be actively used?
> >
>
> Yes! This is the reason for the split. I initially wanted to just
> change the PHY in the original .dts but then I learned there are a lot
> of r2 boards in the wild at QCom so we need to support both.
For what its worth, I've got access to _only_ the r2 boards in a lab
right now and use them quite actively... so please don't pull that dtb
:)
Glad to see some movement on supporting the newer version I've heard
about but haven't seen!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists