lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19648b9c-6df7-45cd-a5ae-624a3e4d860f@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 11:05:31 -0400
From: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To: Chen Ridong <chenridong@...wei.com>, tj@...nel.org,
 lizefan.x@...edance.com, hannes@...xchg.org
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] cgroup: fix uaf when proc_cpuset_show


On 6/22/24 07:38, Chen Ridong wrote:
> We found a refcount UAF bug as follows:
>
> BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in cgroup_path_ns+0x112/0x150
> Read of size 8 at addr ffff8882a4b242b8 by task atop/19903
>
> CPU: 27 PID: 19903 Comm: atop Kdump: loaded Tainted: GF
> Call Trace:
>   dump_stack+0x7d/0xa7
>   print_address_description.constprop.0+0x19/0x170
>   ? cgroup_path_ns+0x112/0x150
>   __kasan_report.cold+0x6c/0x84
>   ? print_unreferenced+0x390/0x3b0
>   ? cgroup_path_ns+0x112/0x150
>   kasan_report+0x3a/0x50
>   cgroup_path_ns+0x112/0x150
>   proc_cpuset_show+0x164/0x530
>   proc_single_show+0x10f/0x1c0
>   seq_read_iter+0x405/0x1020
>   ? aa_path_link+0x2e0/0x2e0
>   seq_read+0x324/0x500
>   ? seq_read_iter+0x1020/0x1020
>   ? common_file_perm+0x2a1/0x4a0
>   ? fsnotify_unmount_inodes+0x380/0x380
>   ? bpf_lsm_file_permission_wrapper+0xa/0x30
>   ? security_file_permission+0x53/0x460
>   vfs_read+0x122/0x420
>   ksys_read+0xed/0x1c0
>   ? __ia32_sys_pwrite64+0x1e0/0x1e0
>   ? __audit_syscall_exit+0x741/0xa70
>   do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
>   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x67/0xcc
>
> This is also reported by: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=9b1ff7be974a403aa4cd
>
> This can be reproduced by the following methods:
> 1.add an mdelay(1000) before acquiring the cgroup_lock In the
>   cgroup_path_ns function.
> 2.$cat /proc/<pid>/cpuset   repeatly.
> 3.$mount -t cgroup -o cpuset cpuset /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/
> $umount /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/   repeatly.
>
> The race that cause this bug can be shown as below:
>
> (umount)		|	(cat /proc/<pid>/cpuset)
> css_release		|	proc_cpuset_show
> css_release_work_fn	|	css = task_get_css(tsk, cpuset_cgrp_id);
> css_free_rwork_fn	|	cgroup_path_ns(css->cgroup, ...);
> cgroup_destroy_root	|	mutex_lock(&cgroup_mutex);
> rebind_subsystems	|
> cgroup_free_root 	|
> 			|	// cgrp was freed, UAF
> 			|	cgroup_path_ns_locked(cgrp,..);
>
> When the cpuset is initialized, the root node top_cpuset.css.cgrp
> will point to &cgrp_dfl_root.cgrp. In cgroup v1, the mount operation will
> allocate cgroup_root, and top_cpuset.css.cgrp will point to the allocated
> &cgroup_root.cgrp. When the umount operation is executed,
> top_cpuset.css.cgrp will be rebound to &cgrp_dfl_root.cgrp.
>
> The problem is that when rebinding to cgrp_dfl_root, there are cases
> where the cgroup_root allocated by setting up the root for cgroup v1
> is cached. This could lead to a Use-After-Free (UAF) if it is
> subsequently freed. The descendant cgroups of cgroup v1 can only be
> freed after the css is released. However, the css of the root will never
> be released, yet the cgroup_root should be freed when it is unmounted.
> This means that obtaining a reference to the css of the root does
> not guarantee that css.cgrp->root will not be freed.
>
> To solve this issue, we have added a cgroup reference count in
> the proc_cpuset_show function to ensure that css.cgrp->root will not
> be freed prematurely. This is a temporary solution. Let's see if anyone
> has a better solution.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Ridong <chenridong@...wei.com>
> ---
>   kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> index c12b9fdb22a4..782eaf807173 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -5045,6 +5045,7 @@ int proc_cpuset_show(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
>   	char *buf;
>   	struct cgroup_subsys_state *css;
>   	int retval;
> +	struct cgroup *root_cgroup = NULL;
>   
>   	retval = -ENOMEM;
>   	buf = kmalloc(PATH_MAX, GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -5052,9 +5053,28 @@ int proc_cpuset_show(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
>   		goto out;
>   
>   	css = task_get_css(tsk, cpuset_cgrp_id);
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	/*
> +	 * When the cpuset subsystem is mounted on the legacy hierarchy,
> +	 * the top_cpuset.css->cgroup does not hold a reference count of
> +	 * cgroup_root.cgroup. This makes accessing css->cgroup very
> +	 * dangerous because when the cpuset subsystem is remounted to the
> +	 * default hierarchy, the cgroup_root.cgroup that css->cgroup points
> +	 * to will be released, leading to a UAF issue. To avoid this problem,
> +	 * get the reference count of top_cpuset.css->cgroup first.
> +	 *
> +	 * This is ugly!!
> +	 */
> +	if (css == &top_cpuset.css) {
> +		cgroup_get(css->cgroup);
> +		root_cgroup = css->cgroup;
> +	}
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
>   	retval = cgroup_path_ns(css->cgroup, buf, PATH_MAX,
>   				current->nsproxy->cgroup_ns);
>   	css_put(css);
> +	if (root_cgroup)
> +		cgroup_put(root_cgroup);
>   	if (retval == -E2BIG)
>   		retval = -ENAMETOOLONG;
>   	if (retval < 0)

Thanks for reporting this UAF bug. Could you try the attached patch to 
see if it can fix the issue?

Cheers,
Longman

View attachment "0001-cgroup-cpuset-Prevent-UAF-in-proc_cpuset_show.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (3357 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ