[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240708141025.3e5ddd51@foz.lan>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 14:10:25 +0200
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Daniel Ferguson
<danielf@...amperecomputing.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, James
Morse <james.morse@....com>, Jonathan Cameron
<Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, "Rafael J.
Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@...wei.com>, Uwe
Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Dan
Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, Ira
Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] RAS: ACPI: APEI: add conditional compilation to ARM
error report functions
Em Mon, 8 Jul 2024 13:32:34 +0200
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> escreveu:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2024 at 01:18:10PM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > From: Daniel Ferguson <danielf@...amperecomputing.com>
> >
> > This prevents the unnecessary inclusion of ARM specific RAS error
>
> s/This prevents/Prevent/
>
> Avoid having "This patch" or "This commit" or "This does <bla>" in the commit
> message. It is tautologically useless.
>
> "Describe your changes in imperative mood, e.g. "make xyzzy do frotz"
> instead of "[This patch] makes xyzzy do frotz" or "[I] changed xyzzy
> to do frotz", as if you are giving orders to the codebase to change
> its behaviour."
>
> From Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
>
> > handling routines in non-ARM platforms.
>
> Ok, this does "something". Why does it do it?
>
> Otherwise it won't build on other architectures or is it going to cause code
> bloat or why are we doing this?
Probably a better description would be:
RAS: ACPI: APEI: add conditional compilation to ARM error report functions
Don't include ARM Processor specific error handling routines in
non-ARM platforms, preparing it to the next patch, as arm-specific
kAPI symbols will be used, thus avoiding build breakages when ARM
is not selected.
[mchehab: avoid unneeded ifdefs and fix coding style issues]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Ferguson <danielf@...amperecomputing.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
This patch itself just add conditionals to optimize out code on
non-ARM architectures. The next one will add some ARM-specific bits
inside ARM processor CPER trace, thus causing compilation breakages
on non-ARM, due to arm-specific kAPI bits that will be used then.
Thanks,
Mauro
Powered by blists - more mailing lists