[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6226f65a-3420-45e0-aeb9-8d31d26a070d@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 10:14:34 +0300
From: "Ceclan, Dumitru" <mitrutzceclan@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
dumitru.ceclan@...log.com
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 9/9] iio: adc: ad7173: Add support for AD411x devices
On 16/07/2024 09:31, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 15/07/2024 19:17, Ceclan, Dumitru wrote:
>>>
>>> Please run scripts/checkpatch.pl and fix reported warnings. Then please
>>> run `scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict` and (probably) fix more warnings.
>>> Some warnings can be ignored, especially from --strict run, but the code
>>> here looks like it needs a fix. Feel free to get in touch if the warning
>>> is not clear.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Krzysztof
>>>
>>
>> I do not get any warnings, only checks
>>
>> If you meant the checks:
>> - for the alignment check, i would only argue for struct_group(config_props that looks good
>> - for unnecessary parentheses the compiler warning appears without the parentheses:
>> warning: suggest parentheses around comparison in operand of ‘!=’ [-Wparentheses]
>
> Hm, in that case it looks like you documented some entirely different
> bindings?
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
On which file checkpatch returned warnings for you?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists