[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2024073102-calculate-disabled-8700@gregkh>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 10:34:14 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Abhishek Tamboli <abhishektamboli9@...il.com>
Cc: skhan@...uxfoundation.org, dan.carpenter@...aro.org,
rbmarliere@...il.com, christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr,
Chris.Wulff@...mp.com,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: u_audio: Use C99 syntax for array
initializers
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 11:16:39PM +0530, Abhishek Tamboli wrote:
> Convert array initializers to C99 syntax by adding the '=' after each
> designated initializer. This change resolves warnings from smatch
> about obsolete array initializers.
>
> drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_audio.c:1117:20:warning: obsolete array initializer, use C99 syntax
> drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_audio.c:1124:28:warning: obsolete array initializer, use C99 syntax
> drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_audio.c:1131:19:warning: obsolete array initializer, use C99 syntax
> drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_audio.c:1138:27:warning: obsolete array initializer, use C99 syntax
> drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_audio.c:1145:25:warning: obsolete array initializer, use C99 syntax
>
> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Tamboli <abhishektamboli9@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_audio.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
Hi,
This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.
You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:
- This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you
did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version.
Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the
kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what
needs to be done here to properly describe this.
If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.
thanks,
greg k-h's patch email bot
Powered by blists - more mailing lists