linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 00/10] AMD XDNA driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <de748b0f-6e05-4c36-a6ad-cc5b09718e0b@web.de>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2024 20:56:53 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@....com>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
 Oded Gabbay <ogabbay@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, George Yang <George.Yang@....com>,
 king.tam@....com, Max Zhen <max.zhen@....com>, Min Ma <min.ma@....com>,
 Narendra Gutta <VenkataNarendraKumar.Gutta@....com>,
 Sonal Santan <sonal.santan@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 00/10] AMD XDNA driver

>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2024/7/19/803
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/010a46ba-9dc4-e3e3-7894-b28b312c6ab1@amd.com/
>> [01/10] accel/amdxdna: Add a new driver for AMD AI Engine
>> “guard looks cleaner. We will use it.”
> We reconsidered this request

Interesting …


> and searched accel and drm subsystem. I did not see it was used.

Do you notice how applications of scope-based resource management are growing
in other subsystem areas?


> This does not look like a required change for upstream at this moment.

Maybe.


> We would keep the current code for this patch series.

Will further collateral evolution become more attractive anyhow?

Regards,
Markus