[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZrNCZtwPB4rignE3@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 11:46:14 +0200
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
To: Zhang Qiao <zhangqiao22@...wei.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Wander Costa <wcosta@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: Fix imbalanced task reference
On 07/08/24 17:39, Zhang Qiao wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
> 在 2024/8/7 17:00, Juri Lelli 写道:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 07/08/24 16:30, Zhang Qiao wrote:
> >> When starting a deadline inactive_timer, the task_struct refs will
> >> be incremented only if dl_server is not set. But when canceling the
> >> inactive_timer, the task refs will be decremented whether dl_server is
> >> set or not, leading to a task reference imbalance issue.
> >>
> >> This patch fixes the imbalanced reference by adding a '!dl_server()'
> >> checker before calling put_task_struct().
> >>
> >> Fixes: 63ba8422f876 ("sched/deadline: Introduce deadline servers")
> >> Signed-off-by: Zhang Qiao <zhangqiao22@...wei.com>
> >
> > Isn't this equivalent to Wander's patch below?
> >
>
> Yeah, i didn't notice it.
Thanks for confirming!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists