[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54f87fcb-74da-4b48-a12e-4c7d9fa2870e@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 13:21:59 +0530
From: Harith George <mail2hgg@...il.com>
To: Yuntao Liu <liuyuntao12@...wei.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux@...linux.org.uk, arnd@...db.de, afd@...com,
rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, eric.devolder@...cle.com, masahiroy@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: Fix build issue with LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION
On 08-08-2024 18:05, Yuntao Liu wrote:
> There is a build issue with LD segmentation fault, while
> CONFIG_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION is not enabled, as bellow.
>
> scripts/link-vmlinux.sh: line 49: 3796 Segmentation fault
> (core dumped) ${ld} ${ldflags} -o ${output} ${wl}--whole-archive
> ${objs} ${wl}--no-whole-archive ${wl}--start-group
> ${libs} ${wl}--end-group ${kallsymso} ${btf_vmlinux_bin_o} ${ldlibs}
>
> The error occurs in older versions of the GNU ld with version earlier
> than 2.36. It makes most sense to have a minimum LD version as
> a dependency for HAVE_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION and eliminate
> the impact of ".reloc .text, R_ARM_NONE, ." when
> CONFIG_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION is not enabled.
>
> Fixes: ed0f94102251 ("ARM: 9404/1: arm32: enable HAVE_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION")
> Reported-by: Harith George <mail2hgg@...il.com>
> Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Signed-off-by: Yuntao Liu <liuyuntao12@...wei.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/14e9aefb-88d1-4eee-8288-ef15d4a9b059@gmail.com/
> ---
> arch/arm/Kconfig | 2 +-
> arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S | 12 +++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> index 54b2bb817a7f..173159e93c99 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ config ARM
> select HAVE_KERNEL_XZ
> select HAVE_KPROBES if !XIP_KERNEL && !CPU_ENDIAN_BE32 && !CPU_V7M
> select HAVE_KRETPROBES if HAVE_KPROBES
> - select HAVE_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION
> + select HAVE_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION if (LD_VERSION >= 23600 || LD_IS_LLD)
> select HAVE_MOD_ARCH_SPECIFIC
> select HAVE_NMI
> select HAVE_OPTPROBES if !THUMB2_KERNEL
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
> index f01d23a220e6..cd443faf8645 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
> @@ -29,6 +29,12 @@
> #include "entry-header.S"
> #include <asm/probes.h>
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION
> +#define RELOC_TEXT_NONE (.reloc .text, R_ARM_NONE, .)
> +#else
> +#define RELOC_TEXT_NONE
> +#endif
> +
> /*
> * Interrupt handling.
> */
> @@ -1065,7 +1071,7 @@ vector_addrexcptn:
> .globl vector_fiq
>
> .section .vectors, "ax", %progbits
> - .reloc .text, R_ARM_NONE, .
> + RELOC_TEXT_NONE
> W(b) vector_rst
> W(b) vector_und
> ARM( .reloc ., R_ARM_LDR_PC_G0, .L__vector_swi )
> @@ -1079,7 +1085,7 @@ THUMB( .reloc ., R_ARM_THM_PC12, .L__vector_swi )
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_HARDEN_BRANCH_HISTORY
> .section .vectors.bhb.loop8, "ax", %progbits
> - .reloc .text, R_ARM_NONE, .
> + RELOC_TEXT_NONE
> W(b) vector_rst
> W(b) vector_bhb_loop8_und
> ARM( .reloc ., R_ARM_LDR_PC_G0, .L__vector_bhb_loop8_swi )
> @@ -1092,7 +1098,7 @@ THUMB( .reloc ., R_ARM_THM_PC12, .L__vector_bhb_loop8_swi )
> W(b) vector_bhb_loop8_fiq
>
> .section .vectors.bhb.bpiall, "ax", %progbits
> - .reloc .text, R_ARM_NONE, .
> + RELOC_TEXT_NONE
> W(b) vector_rst
> W(b) vector_bhb_bpiall_und
> ARM( .reloc ., R_ARM_LDR_PC_G0, .L__vector_bhb_bpiall_swi )
Build tested. Solves the earlier build issue I was seeing.
fwiw, you can add my tested by tag if needed.
Tested-by: Harith George <mail2hgg@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists