[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3705015d-7205-4b81-9a01-670f1d628388@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 15:58:27 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Andrei Simion <andrei.simion@...rochip.com>, claudiu.beznea@...on.dev,
nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, peda@...ntia.se
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, cristian.birsan@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] ARM: dts: microchip: Rename the pmic node
On 14/08/2024 15:20, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 14/08/2024 14:26, Andrei Simion wrote:
>> Rename the pmic node according to the devicetree
>> specification.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrei Simion <andrei.simion@...rochip.com>
>> ---
>> Split the bloated patch into small patches on topics
>> based on comments
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/89f51615-0dee-4ab0-ab72-e3c057fee1e7@tuxon.dev/
>> ---
>
> All renames should be rather together.
>
I retract my statement, I thought you keep renaming one type of devices
per patch. Other renames are a bit different, so it was reasonable to
keep them separate.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists