linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next RESEND 00/10] mtd: Use for_each_child_of_node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ade6d403-e54c-80fb-7d51-1e00602fcbfb@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 18:56:37 +0800
From: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Miquel Raynal
	<miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
CC: <michal.simek@....com>, <richard@....at>, <vigneshr@...com>,
	<liang.yang@...ogic.com>, <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
	<khilman@...libre.com>, <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
	<martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>, <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, <heiko@...ech.de>,
	<mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, <wens@...e.org>,
	<jernej.skrabec@...il.com>, <samuel@...lland.org>, <kees@...nel.org>,
	<gustavoars@...nel.org>, <linux@...blig.org>, <robh@...nel.org>,
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, <erick.archer@....com>,
	<christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>, <val@...kett.cool>,
	<christophe.kerello@...s.st.com>, <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>, <jic23@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next RESEND 00/10] mtd: Use
 for_each_child_of_node_scoped()



On 2024/8/26 18:19, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 26/08/2024 11:52, Miquel Raynal wrote:
>> Hi Jinjie,
>>
>> ruanjinjie@...wei.com wrote on Mon, 26 Aug 2024 17:43:18 +0800:
>>
>>> Use scoped for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped() when iterating over
>>> device nodes to make code a bit simpler.
>>
>> Why is this a resend ? Did I miss a previous iteration?
> 
> You were not cc-ed on previous iteration. I asked for proper split
> between subsystems and sending to maintainers, thus this resend.
> 
> Although for such big patchset, I would expect some waiting time, not
> sending immediately.

Sorry, I will pay attention to it later.

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>