lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240826144917.2c4e202d@xps-13>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 14:49:17 +0200
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>, michal.simek@....com,
 richard@....at, vigneshr@...com, liang.yang@...ogic.com,
 neil.armstrong@...aro.org, khilman@...libre.com, jbrunet@...libre.com,
 martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
 angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com, heiko@...ech.de,
 mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com, alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, wens@...e.org,
 jernej.skrabec@...il.com, samuel@...lland.org, kees@...nel.org,
 gustavoars@...nel.org, linux@...blig.org, robh@...nel.org,
 u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de, erick.archer@....com,
 christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr, val@...kett.cool,
 christophe.kerello@...s.st.com, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com, jic23@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next RESEND 00/10] mtd: Use
 for_each_child_of_node_scoped()

Hi Krzysztof,

krzk@...nel.org wrote on Mon, 26 Aug 2024 12:19:07 +0200:

> On 26/08/2024 11:52, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > Hi Jinjie,
> > 
> > ruanjinjie@...wei.com wrote on Mon, 26 Aug 2024 17:43:18 +0800:
> >   
> >> Use scoped for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped() when iterating over
> >> device nodes to make code a bit simpler.  
> > 
> > Why is this a resend ? Did I miss a previous iteration?  
> 
> You were not cc-ed on previous iteration. I asked for proper split
> between subsystems and sending to maintainers, thus this resend.

Ok. Makes sense, and the patchset looks fine.

Jinjie, please always include a changelog when you send new versions,
and explanations for a RESEND.

Thanks,
Miquèl

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ