[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <gsntmskw9w9b.fsf@coltonlewis-kvm.c.googlers.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 21:24:00 +0000
From: Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@...gle.com>
To: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@...gle.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, ljr.kernel@...il.com, jmattson@...gle.com,
aaronlewis@...gle.com, seanjc@...gle.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
shuah@...nel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] KVM: x86: selftests: Fix typos in macro variable use
Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@...gle.com> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2024, Colton Lewis wrote:
>> Without the leading underscore, these variables are referencing a
>> variable in the calling scope. It only worked before by accident
>> because all calling scopes had a variable with the right name.
>> Signed-off-by: Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@...gle.com>
> This might need a fixes tag, right?
> Fixes: cd34fd8c758e ("KVM: selftests: Test PMC virtualization with forced
> emulation")
> no need to cc stable tree though, since this is very minor.
> Reviewed-by: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@...gle.com>
Yes it does. Thanks for the catch.
>> ---
>> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_counters_test.c | 6 +++---
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_counters_test.c
>> b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_counters_test.c
>> index 698cb36989db..0e305e43a93b 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_counters_test.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_counters_test.c
>> @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ do { \
>> #define GUEST_TEST_EVENT(_idx, _event, _pmc, _pmc_msr, _ctrl_msr,
>> _value, FEP) \
>> do { \
>> - wrmsr(pmc_msr, 0); \
>> + wrmsr(_pmc_msr, 0); \
>> \
>> if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CLFLUSHOPT)) \
>> GUEST_MEASURE_EVENT(_ctrl_msr, _value, "clflushopt .", FEP); \
>> @@ -331,9 +331,9 @@ __GUEST_ASSERT(expect_gp ? vector ==
>> GP_VECTOR : !vector, \
>> expect_gp ? "#GP" : "no fault", msr, vector) \
>> #define GUEST_ASSERT_PMC_VALUE(insn, msr, val, expected) \
>> - __GUEST_ASSERT(val == expected_val, \
>> + __GUEST_ASSERT(val == expected, \
>> "Expected " #insn "(0x%x) to yield 0x%lx, got 0x%lx", \
>> - msr, expected_val, val);
>> + msr, expected, val);
>> static void guest_test_rdpmc(uint32_t rdpmc_idx, bool expect_success,
>> uint64_t expected_val)
>> --
>> 2.46.0.76.ge559c4bf1a-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists