[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1b202582-0487-483c-ba80-47125551eb5d@bootlin.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 10:06:45 +0200
From: Thomas Bonnefille <thomas.bonnefille@...tlin.com>
To: Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@...look.com>,
Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...look.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Chao Wei <chao.wei@...hgo.com>, Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Miquèl Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] riscv: dts: sophgo: Add LicheeRV Nano board device
tree
>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR MIT)
>>> +/*
>>> + * Copyright (C) 2024 Thomas Bonnefille <thomas.bonnefille@...tlin.com>
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +/dts-v1/;
>>> +
>>> +#include "sg2002.dtsi"
>>> +
>>> +/ {
>>> + model = "LicheeRV Nano B";
>>> + compatible = "sipeed,licheerv-nano-b", "sipeed,licheerv-nano",
>>> "sophgo,sg2002";
>>> +
>>> + aliases {
>>> + gpio0 = &gpio0;
>>> + gpio1 = &gpio1;
>>> + gpio2 = &gpio2;
>>> + gpio3 = &gpio3;
>>> + serial0 = &uart0;
>>> + serial1 = &uart1;
>>> + serial2 = &uart2;
>>> + serial3 = &uart3;
>>> + serial4 = &uart4;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + chosen {
>>> + stdout-path = "serial0:115200n8";
>>> + };
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +&osc {
>>> + clock-frequency = <25000000>;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +&sdhci0 {
>>> + status = "okay";
>>> + bus-width = <4>;
>>> + no-1-8-v;
>>> + no-mmc;
>>> + no-sdio;
>>> + disable-wp;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +&uart0 {
>>> + status = "okay";
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +&uart1 {
>>> + status = "okay";
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +&i2c0 {
>>> + status = "okay";
>>> +};
>>>
>>> --
>>> 2.45.2
>>>
>> Have you test you patch with a real board? Especially
>> for device "uart1" and "i2c0", I suspect your
>> configuartion does not work by default.
>
> Hi, Thomas Bonnefille,
>
> Can you please double check and feedback, I want to confirm this before
> acking this change.
>
> As you know, rc6 will come next week and I'm planning a pr next week.
>
> Regards,
>
> Chen
>
Hello Chen and Inochi,
I'm really sorry, indeed, those nodes certainly don't work, it was a
mistake on my side introduced between v1 and v2.
However, I can ensure that "uart0" and "sdhci0" are working fine.
May I suggest to remove those two nodes? I can send a new iteration if
it's easier for you to handle?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists