[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <stnyjmnqdobzq2f2ntq32tu4kq6ohsxyevjn5rgz3uu2qncuzl@nt4ifscgokgj>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 23:39:15 +0200
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
To: Tyrone Ting <warp5tw@...il.com>
Cc: avifishman70@...il.com, tmaimon77@...il.com, tali.perry1@...il.com,
venture@...gle.com, yuenn@...gle.com, benjaminfair@...gle.com,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, wsa@...nel.org, rand.sec96@...il.com,
wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com, tali.perry@...oton.com, Avi.Fishman@...oton.com,
tomer.maimon@...oton.com, KWLIU@...oton.com, JJLIU0@...oton.com, kfting@...oton.com,
openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] i2c: npcm: Modify timeout evaluation mechanism
Hi Tyrone,
On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 11:46:37AM GMT, Tyrone Ting wrote:
> Increase the timeout and treat it as the total timeout, including retries.
> The total timeout is 2 seconds now.
Why?
> The i2c core layer will have chances to retry to call the i2c driver
> transfer function if the i2c driver reports that the bus is busy and
> returns EAGAIN.
>
> Fixes: 48acf8292280 ("i2c: Remove redundant comparison in npcm_i2c_reg_slave")
What is the bug you are fixing?
> Signed-off-by: Tyrone Ting <kfting@...oton.com>
Still... can someone from the nuvoton supporters/reviewers check
this patch?
Thanks,
Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists