[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zu2UEAY1jweup6tS@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 18:26:08 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Parker Newman <parker@...est.io>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
Parker Newman <pnewman@...necttech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] serial: 8250_exar: Replace custom EEPROM read
with eeprom_93cx6
On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 10:03:23AM -0400, Parker Newman wrote:
> From: Parker Newman <pnewman@...necttech.com>
...
> + osc_freq = le16_to_cpu(ee_words[0]) | (le16_to_cpu(ee_words[1]) << 16);
> + if (osc_freq == GENMASK(31, 0))
> return -EIO;
Just noticed that you have
#define CTI_EE_MASK_OSC_FREQ_LOWER GENMASK(15, 0)
#define CTI_EE_MASK_OSC_FREQ_UPPER GENMASK(31, 16)
So, please modify them and the above check using these.
Something like
#define CTI_EE_MASK_OSC_FREQ GENMASK(31, 0)
osc_freq = le16_to_cpu(ee_words[0]) | (le16_to_cpu(ee_words[1]) << 16);
if (osc_freq == CTI_EE_MASK_OSC_FREQ)
return -EIO;
P.S> If I am not mistaken the definitions were only used in this function.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists