linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Fix array property constraints

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240926-bullion-semester-024fab878903@spud>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 17:36:51 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
	Paul Elder <paul.elder@...asonboard.com>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
	Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@...il.com>,
	Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@...nel.org>,
	Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
	Broadcom internal kernel review list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
	Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
	Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
	Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@...adcom.com>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Fix array property constraints

On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 06:24:06PM -0500, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> Schemas for array properties should only have 1 level of array
> constraints (e.g. items, maxItems, minItems). Sometimes the old
> encoding of all properties into a matrix leaked into the schema, and
> didn't matter for validation. Now the inner constraints are just
> silently ignored as json-schema array keywords are ignored on scalar
> values.
> 
> Generally, keep the inner constraints and drop the outer "items". With
> gicv3 "mbi-alias" property, it is more appropriately a uint32 or uint64
> as it is an address and size depends on "#address-cells".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@...nel.org>

Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)