linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 0/1] livepatch: Add "stack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.21.2410021343570.19326@pobox.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 13:44:24 +0200 (CEST)
From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
To: Wardenjohn <zhangwarden@...il.com>
cc: jpoimboe@...nel.org, jikos@...nel.org, pmladek@...e.com, 
    joe.lawrence@...hat.com, live-patching@...r.kernel.org, 
    linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/1] livepatch: Add "stack_order" sysfs attribute

Hello,

On Sun, 29 Sep 2024, Wardenjohn wrote:

> As previous discussion, maintainers think that patch-level sysfs interface is the
> only acceptable way to maintain the information of the order that klp_patch is 
> applied to the system.
> 
> However, the previous patch introduce klp_ops into klp_func is a optimization 
> methods of the patch introducing 'using' feature to klp_func.
> 
> But now, we don't support 'using' feature to klp_func and make 'klp_ops' patch
> not necessary.
> 
> Therefore, this new version is only introduce the sysfs feature of klp_patch 
> 'stack_order'.

could you also include the selftests as discussed before, please?

Miroslav