[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zv92nsoLxbfI45Ji@linux.dev>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 22:01:18 -0700
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, maz@...nel.org,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 47/47] KVM: arm64: nv: Add trap forwarding for FEAT_FGT2
described registers
On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 09:46:08AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> > I have a patch in the nested PMU series that uses a single complex trap
> > ID to evaluate HPMN, and derives the index from ESR_EL2. I think it
> > could also be extended to the PMEVCNTSVR<n> range as well.
>
> Just for reference - the mentioned complex trap ID function from the
> given link below.
>
> static enum trap_behaviour check_mdcr_hpmn(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> u32 sysreg = esr_sys64_to_sysreg(kvm_vcpu_get_esr(vcpu));
> u64 mask = kvm_pmu_accessible_counter_mask(vcpu);
> unsigned int idx;
>
>
> switch (sysreg) {
> case SYS_PMEVTYPERn_EL0(0) ... SYS_PMEVTYPERn_EL0(30):
> case SYS_PMEVCNTRn_EL0(0) ... SYS_PMEVCNTRn_EL0(30):
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Just add the new system register range here ?
>
> + case SYS_PMEVCNTSVR_EL1(0)... SYS_PMEVCNTSVR_EL1(31):
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> idx = (sys_reg_CRm(sysreg) & 0x3) << 3 | sys_reg_Op2(sysreg);
> break;
Yes, so long as the layout of encodings matches the established pattern
for value / type registers (I haven't checked this).
> >
> > Also, keep in mind that the HPMN trap is annoying since it affects Host
> > EL0 in addition to 'guest' ELs.
>
> Does this require any more special handling other than the above complex trap
> ID function ?
There's another patch in that series I linked that allows EL2 traps to
describe behavior that takes effect in host EL0.
So I don't believe there's anything in particular related to HPMN that
you need to evaluate. I wanted to mention it because some of the PMU
related traps besides HPMN take effect in Host EL0, so do keep it in
mind.
With that said, I haven't seen an FGT yet that applies to Host EL0.
--
Thanks,
Oliver
Powered by blists - more mailing lists