[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241007081015.GF18071@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 10:10:15 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix typo of head comment of ___update_load_avg
On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 08:42:14AM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Oct 2024 at 02:53, Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > The head comment of ___update_load_avg illustrates the principle of
> > PELT divider. "unwanted oscillation in the range [1002..1024[" should
> > be "unwanted oscillation in the range [1002..1024]".
> >
> > Fix above typo.
>
> This is not a typo as 1024 is an excluded endpoint of the interval.
> Some may use [1002..1024) but both [1002..1024[ and [1002..1024) can
> be used
Because I'm weird, I googled this, and the [a,b[ notation is from
Bourbaki and hence popular in the French speaking world :-)
We don't have many intervals specified in comments and hence we can't
make the inconsistent style argument either.
So yeah, let it be.. at best its a trigger to get people to better look
at the code. At worst its one of those triggers that people keep trying
to mindlessly 'fix', like my use of borken :-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists