[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEf4BzY5zgoYAgJG7tfa84F2Zzjq=YFjh3=OzWqA6h39FfXB4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 19:30:19 -0700
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 bpf-next 15/16] selftests/bpf: Add uprobe sessions to
consumer test
On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 1:13 PM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Adding uprobe session consumers to the consumer test,
> so we get the session into the test mix.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
> ---
> .../bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c | 63 +++++++++++++++----
> .../bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_consumers.c | 16 ++++-
> 2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
you are undoing most of the changes done in the previous patch... it
seems like it would be better to just combine both patches
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
> index 2effe4d693b4..df9314309bc3 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c
> @@ -761,6 +761,10 @@ get_program(struct uprobe_multi_consumers *skel, int prog)
> return skel->progs.uprobe_0;
> case 1:
> return skel->progs.uprobe_1;
> + case 2:
> + return skel->progs.uprobe_2;
> + case 3:
> + return skel->progs.uprobe_3;
> default:
> ASSERT_FAIL("get_program");
> return NULL;
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists