[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEEQ3wk6K52RdCat+L91KvfNVkxbj1-3zxjubkn9xy89wK_-bA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 20:30:46 +0800
From: yunhui cui <cuiyunhui@...edance.com>
To: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>
Cc: punit.agrawal@...edance.com, paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com,
aou@...s.berkeley.edu, sunilvl@...tanamicro.com, ajones@...tanamicro.com,
alexghiti@...osinc.com, jeeheng.sia@...rfivetech.com, haibo1.xu@...el.com,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: ACPI: fix early_ioremap to early_memremap
Hi Alex,
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 8:12 PM Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr> wrote:
>
> Hi Yunhui,
>
> On 14/10/2024 11:47, Yunhui Cui wrote:
> > When SVPBMT is enabled, __acpi_map_table() will directly access the
> > data in DDR through the IO attribute, rather than through hardware
> > cache consistency, resulting in incorrect data in the obtained ACPI
> > table.
> >
> > The log: ACPI: [ACPI:0x18] Invalid zero length.
> >
> > We do not assume whether the bootloader flushes or not. We should
> > access in a cacheable way instead of maintaining cache consistency
> > by software.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yunhui Cui <cuiyunhui@...edance.com>
> > ---
> > arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c
> > index 6e0d333f57e5..3177c9af8764 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c
> > @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ void __init __iomem *__acpi_map_table(unsigned long phys, unsigned long size)
> > if (!size)
> > return NULL;
> >
> > - return early_ioremap(phys, size);
> > + return early_memremap(phys, size);
> > }
> >
> > void __init __acpi_unmap_table(void __iomem *map, unsigned long size)
>
>
> It makes sense to me since with this, we don't have to care about how
> the firmware mapped the table. And it mimics all other architectures
> (arm64, loongarch and x86).
>
> Here is the corresponding fixes tag:
>
> Fixes: 3b426d4b5b14 ("RISC-V: ACPI : Fix for usage of pointers in
> different address space")
>
> With the corresponding fix in __acpi_unmap_table() as pointed by Sunil,
> you can add:
>
> Reviewed-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@...osinc.com>
>
> And regarding the sparse error, I don't see any other architecture
> casting to __iomem, so maybe that's not necessary anymore?
OK. I will make the changes in v2. Regarding the sparse error, I will
use another patch specifically to solve it. Is that okay?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alex
>
>
Thanks,
Yunhui
Powered by blists - more mailing lists