[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7dc638fe-2bee-4693-9bca-2732eb502724@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 09:20:30 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Igor Belwon <igor.belwon@...tallysanemainliners.org>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] dt-bindings: pinctrl: samsung: add
exynos990-wakeup-eint compatible
On 15/10/2024 23:04, Igor Belwon wrote:
> Add a dedicated compatible for the exynos990-wakeup-eint node.
This we see from the diff. Explain the hardware, why suddenly it became
compatible with exynos850, even though it was not.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists