linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v5 2/3] connector/cn_proc: Kunit tests for threads hash table

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZxkQvYNVGA90srE7@mini-arch>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 08:05:33 -0700
From: Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@...il.com>
To: Anjali Kulkarni <anjali.k.kulkarni@...cle.com>
Cc: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@...cle.com>,
	"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
	"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"juri.lelli@...hat.com" <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
	"vincent.guittot@...aro.org" <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
	"dietmar.eggemann@....com" <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
	"rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	"bsegall@...gle.com" <bsegall@...gle.com>,
	"mgorman@...e.de" <mgorman@...e.de>,
	"vschneid@...hat.com" <vschneid@...hat.com>,
	"jiri@...nulli.us" <jiri@...nulli.us>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"shuah@...nel.org" <shuah@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
	Pei Li <peili.io@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 2/3] connector/cn_proc: Kunit tests for
 threads hash table

On 10/23, Anjali Kulkarni wrote:
> […snip…]
> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> Yes, make sure all required options are picked up by
> >>>> "./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run" instead of manually adding options
> >>>> and doing modprobe.
> >>> 
> >>> The environment issues are resolved and I am able to run kunit.py, but my tests
> >>> are not invoked without giving options via —kconfig-add. Other tests are also not
> >>> invoked. Running with the manual options runs 413 tests, and with just kunit.py
> >>> runs 389 tests. (I have added 6). Any idea how I can make it run my tests?
> >> 
> >> The runner does: ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --alltests
> >> Is it not enough in your case? What options do you pass via
> >> --kconfig-add? Is it because CONNECTOR stuff is disabled by default?
> > 
> > No, it still does not run.
> > However, I added to tools/testing/kunit/configs/all_tests.config:
> > 
> > CONFIG_CONNECTOR=y
> > CONFIG_PROC_EVENTS=y
> > CONFIG_NET=y
> > CONFIG_CN_HASH_KUNIT_TEST=y
> > 
> > And now it does run.
> > Should I make the change above? I will also check with the kunit guys.
> > But I do not understand how it ran for you(and run into the error), or did
> > it just try to compile?
> 
> I see this in comments on top of all_tests.config.
> 
> # The config is manually maintained, though it uses KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y to enable
> # any tests whose dependencies are already satisfied. Please feel free to add
> # more options if they any new tests.
> 
> So I suppose if a test needs more dependencies, it needs to be added here.

Let's try and CC a bunch of kunit people to confirm :-)