[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241031154314.576ksnwaruuqqwq2@quack3>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 16:43:14 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] xattr: remove redundant check on variable err
On Wed 30-10-24 18:01:40, Colin Ian King wrote:
> Curretly in function generic_listxattr the for_each_xattr_handler loop
> checks err and will return out of the function if err is non-zero.
> It's impossible for err to be non-zero at the end of the function where
> err is checked again for a non-zero value. The final non-zero check is
> therefore redundant and can be removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>
Yeah, makes sense. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Honza
> ---
> fs/xattr.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xattr.c b/fs/xattr.c
> index 05ec7e7d9e87..21beb82ab5dc 100644
> --- a/fs/xattr.c
> +++ b/fs/xattr.c
> @@ -1015,7 +1015,7 @@ generic_listxattr(struct dentry *dentry, char *buffer, size_t buffer_size)
> return err;
> }
>
> - return err ? err : buffer_size - remaining_size;
> + return buffer_size - remaining_size;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(generic_listxattr);
>
> --
> 2.39.5
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists