[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2131e750-f5e9-43e8-816f-924516336fce@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 13:35:18 +0200
From: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>
To: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
Cc: loic.poulain@...aro.org, rfoss@...nel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Abaci Robot <abaci@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 -next] i2c: qcom-cci: Remove the unused variable
cci_clk_rate
On 10/31/24 13:13, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> Hi Andi,
>
> On 10/31/24 12:44, Andi Shyti wrote:
>> Hi Jiapeng,
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 10:09:31AM +0800, Jiapeng Chong wrote:
>>> Variable ret is not effectively used, so delete it.
>>>
>>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-cci.c:526:16: warning: variable ‘cci_clk_rate’ set but not used.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@...ux.alibaba.com>
>>> Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=11532
>>> Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@...ux.alibaba.com>
>>
>> thanks for your patch! Applied to i2c/i2c-host
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Andi
>>
>
> FWIW I've noticed that my Reviewed-by tag was added to the accepted change,
> while it was the conditional one... Actually I don't know how to be aware
> of such nuances, if only b4 tool is used, likely there is no way for it.
>
> Hopefully I'm not too picky with it.
If it still matters, this one apparently unnoticed candidate would
have been a better choice:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-i2c/20241031095339.76535-1-jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com
--
Best wishes,
Vladimir
Powered by blists - more mailing lists