[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241104153113.GA111159-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 09:31:13 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Ciprian Marian Costea <ciprianmarian.costea@....nxp.com>
Cc: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
NXP S32 Linux Team <s32@....com>,
Christophe Lizzi <clizzi@...hat.com>,
Alberto Ruiz <aruizrui@...hat.com>,
Enric Balletbo <eballetb@...hat.com>,
Bogdan-Gabriel Roman <bogdan-gabriel.roman@....com>,
Ghennadi Procopciuc <ghennadi.procopciuc@....com>,
IMX Review List <imx@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: rtc: add schema for NXP S32G2/S32G3
SoCs
On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 10:22:05AM +0200, Ciprian Marian Costea wrote:
> On 11/1/2024 7:57 PM, Frank Li wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 11:29:24AM +0200, Ciprian Marian Costea wrote:
> > > On 10/31/2024 6:39 PM, Frank Li wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello Frank,
> > >
> > > Thank you for your review!
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 10:35:54AM +0200, Ciprian Costea wrote:
> > > > > From: Ciprian Marian Costea <ciprianmarian.costea@....nxp.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > This patch adds the dt-bindings for NXP S32G2/S32G3 SoCs RTC driver.
> > > > >
> > > > > Co-developed-by: Bogdan-Gabriel Roman <bogdan-gabriel.roman@....com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Bogdan-Gabriel Roman <bogdan-gabriel.roman@....com>
> > > > > Co-developed-by: Ghennadi Procopciuc <ghennadi.procopciuc@....com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Ghennadi Procopciuc <ghennadi.procopciuc@....com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Ciprian Marian Costea <ciprianmarian.costea@....nxp.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > next time you can cc imx@...ts.linux.dev
> > >
> > > Thanks for your suggestion, I will start adding this list.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > .../devicetree/bindings/rtc/nxp,s32g-rtc.yaml | 99 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > 1 file changed, 99 insertions(+)
> > > > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/nxp,s32g-rtc.yaml
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/nxp,s32g-rtc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/nxp,s32g-rtc.yaml
> > > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > > index 000000000000..3694af883dc7
> > > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/nxp,s32g-rtc.yaml
> > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
> > > > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > > > > +%YAML 1.2
> > > > > +---
> > > > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/rtc/nxp,s32g-rtc.yaml#
> > > > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > > > > +
> > > > > +title: NXP S32G2/S32G3 Real Time Clock (RTC)
> > > > > +
> > > > > +maintainers:
> > > > > + - Bogdan Hamciuc <bogdan.hamciuc@....com>
> > > > > + - Ciprian Marian Costea <ciprianmarian.costea@....com>
> > > > > +
> > > > > +properties:
> > > > > + compatible:
> > > > > + oneOf:
> > > > > + - enum:
> > > > > + - nxp,s32g2-rtc
> > > > > + - items:
> > > > > + - const: nxp,s32g3-rtc
> > > > > + - const: nxp,s32g2-rtc
> > > > > +
> > > > > + reg:
> > > > > + maxItems: 1
> > > > > +
> > > > > + interrupts:
> > > > > + maxItems: 1
> > > > > +
> > > > > + "#clock-cells":
> > > > > + const: 1
> > > >
> > > > Does your RTC is clock provider? why need #clock-cells
> > > >
> > >
> > > RTC clocking on S32G2/S32G3 has a clock mux for selecting between up to 4
> > > different clock sources (parents).
> > > Now, as suggested in previous reviews, I've switched to using the CCF in
> > > order to implement this hardware particularity. In the end I've resorted to
> > > implementing 'assigned-*' approach which while not mandatory as per proposed
> > > bindings I find it quite scalable in selecting clock sources for the RTC
> > > module compared to the first iteration (V1) of this patchset.
> >
> > Any link of previous review?
> >
> > Frank
> >
>
> Please consider the following related reviews:
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/202409121403232ab1295b@mail.local/
> [2]
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/6659aa90-53c5-4a91-a9f9-01120c88f107@oss.nxp.com/
> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241016160823c22ccb22@mail.local/
I've replied on the prior version.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists