[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <sb56cs5tsnuwkfkfxvp34o2rt5r4z6b5l4jukrst2htvpvb62l@axbbmg4lpf5l>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 10:58:17 -0800
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>
To: Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@...il.com>
Cc: hannes@...xchg.org, mhocko@...nel.org, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev,
muchun.song@...ux.dev, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] memcg/hugetlb: Deprecate hugetlb memcg
try-commit-cancel charging
On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 01:27:53PM -0500, Joshua Hahn wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 6:50 PM Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev> wrote:
> >
> > Please cleanup mem_cgroup_cancel_charge() and mem_cgroup_commit_charge()
> > as well as there will be no users after this patch.
> >
>
> Hi Shakeel,
>
> Thank you for your feedback. Unfortunately, it seems like even after this
> patch removes the references from hugetlb.c, there are still some
> references from other files.
>
> mem_cgroup_cancel_charge:
> - memcontrol-v1.c~__mem_cgroup_clear_mc(void)
__mem_cgroup_clear_mc() is gone. No more reference to
mem_cgroup_cancel_charge after your patch.
>
> mem_cgroup_commit_charge:
> - memcontrol.c~charge_memcg(struct folio *folio, struct mem_cgroup...)
>
> In fact, in my patch, I add an extra call to charge_memcg. I think for this
> case, it makes sense to just extract out the functionality from
> mem_cgroup_commit_charge (3 lines) and expand it out inside charge_memcg,
> and get rid of mem_cgroup_commit_charge.
Yup just inline mem_cgroup_commit_charge into charge_memcg and remove
mem_cgroup_commit_charge.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists