[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241109133846.53d7ef06@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2024 13:38:46 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Jiasheng Jiang <jiashengjiangcool@...il.com>
Cc: lars@...afoo.de, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com,
alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com,
tgamblin@...libre.com, fabrice.gasnier@...com,
benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org, lee@...nel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio: trigger: stm32-timer-trigger: Add check for
clk_enable()
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 20:09:00 +0000
Jiasheng Jiang <jiashengjiangcool@...il.com> wrote:
> Add check for the return value of clk_enable() in order to catch the
> potential exception.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiashengjiangcool@...il.com>
Hi,
In principle this is fine, but I'd rather we made use of guard()
/ scoped_guard() rather than adding the explicit unlocks.
If you do that as a precursor patch in appropriate places
in the driver then this will be a little cleaner.
Note I'll not be taking this until next cycle now anyway.
Jonathan
> ---
> Changelog:
>
> v1 -> v2:
>
> 1. Remove unsuitable dev_err_probe().
> ---
> drivers/iio/trigger/stm32-timer-trigger.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/trigger/stm32-timer-trigger.c b/drivers/iio/trigger/stm32-timer-trigger.c
> index 0684329956d9..e1e077122f73 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/trigger/stm32-timer-trigger.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/trigger/stm32-timer-trigger.c
> @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ static int stm32_timer_start(struct stm32_timer_trigger *priv,
> unsigned int frequency)
> {
> unsigned long long prd, div;
> - int prescaler = 0;
> + int prescaler = 0, ret;
> u32 ccer;
>
> /* Period and prescaler values depends of clock rate */
> @@ -153,7 +153,11 @@ static int stm32_timer_start(struct stm32_timer_trigger *priv,
> mutex_lock(&priv->lock);
> if (!priv->enabled) {
> priv->enabled = true;
> - clk_enable(priv->clk);
> + ret = clk_enable(priv->clk);
> + if (ret) {
> + mutex_unlock(&priv->lock);
as below guard() for when the mutex is locked is cleaner.
> + return ret;
> + }
> }
>
> regmap_write(priv->regmap, TIM_PSC, prescaler);
> @@ -307,7 +311,7 @@ static ssize_t stm32_tt_store_master_mode(struct device *dev,
> struct stm32_timer_trigger *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> struct iio_trigger *trig = to_iio_trigger(dev);
> u32 mask, shift, master_mode_max;
> - int i;
> + int i, ret;
>
> if (stm32_timer_is_trgo2_name(trig->name)) {
> mask = TIM_CR2_MMS2;
> @@ -326,7 +330,11 @@ static ssize_t stm32_tt_store_master_mode(struct device *dev,
> if (!priv->enabled) {
> /* Clock should be enabled first */
> priv->enabled = true;
> - clk_enable(priv->clk);
> + ret = clk_enable(priv->clk);
> + if (ret) {
> + mutex_unlock(&priv->lock);
As below. Prefer use of guard() so we don't have to handle the unlock manually.
> + return ret;
> + }
> }
> regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, TIM_CR2, mask,
> i << shift);
> @@ -482,6 +490,7 @@ static int stm32_counter_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> int val, int val2, long mask)
> {
> struct stm32_timer_trigger *priv = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> + int ret;
>
> switch (mask) {
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
> @@ -496,7 +505,11 @@ static int stm32_counter_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> if (val) {
> if (!priv->enabled) {
> priv->enabled = true;
> - clk_enable(priv->clk);
> + ret = clk_enable(priv->clk);
> + if (ret) {
> + mutex_unlock(&priv->lock);
Add include of cleanup.h and swithch the place where the mutex is locked to
guard(mutex)(&priv->lock);
then remember to drop the explicit unlocks.
> + return ret;
> + }
> }
> regmap_set_bits(priv->regmap, TIM_CR1, TIM_CR1_CEN);
> } else {
> @@ -601,7 +614,7 @@ static int stm32_set_enable_mode(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> unsigned int mode)
> {
> struct stm32_timer_trigger *priv = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> - int sms = stm32_enable_mode2sms(mode);
> + int sms = stm32_enable_mode2sms(mode), ret;
>
> if (sms < 0)
> return sms;
> @@ -611,7 +624,12 @@ static int stm32_set_enable_mode(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> */
> mutex_lock(&priv->lock);
Perhaps scoped_guard() is appropriate here.
> if (sms == 6 && !priv->enabled) {
> - clk_enable(priv->clk);
> + ret = clk_enable(priv->clk);
> + if (ret) {
> + mutex_unlock(&priv->lock);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> priv->enabled = true;
> }
> mutex_unlock(&priv->lock);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists