[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9e426477-ed45-4e32-a61b-917413b2ad76@suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 18:47:11 +0100
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>, Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v1 2/2] mm/memory_hotplug: don't use __GFP_HARDWALL
when migrating pages via memory offlining
On 12/5/24 10:05, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> We'll migrate pages allocated by other context; respecting the cpuset of
> the memory offlining context when allocating a migration target does not
> make sense.
>
> Drop the __GFP_HARDWALL by using GFP_KERNEL.
>
> Note that in an ideal world, migration code could figure out the cpuset
> of the original context and take that into consideration.
>
> Suggested-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Thanks!
> ---
> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index 5f497ccf473d..3b6f93962481 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -1838,7 +1838,7 @@ static void do_migrate_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
> nodemask_t nmask = node_states[N_MEMORY];
> struct migration_target_control mtc = {
> .nmask = &nmask,
> - .gfp_mask = GFP_USER | __GFP_MOVABLE | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL,
> + .gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_MOVABLE | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL,
> .reason = MR_MEMORY_HOTPLUG,
> };
> int ret;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists