[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86ttbbsm69.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 13:27:26 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@...aro.org>, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@...cinc.com>,
Xilin Wu <wuxilin123@...il.com>,
Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Aleksandrs Vinarskis <alex.vinarskis@...il.com>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] arm64: dts: qcom: x1e*: Fix USB QMP PHY supplies
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 13:18:20 +0000,
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 10:07:31AM +0100, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> > On the X1E80100 CRD, &vreg_l3e_1p2 only powers &usb_mp_qmpphy0/1
> > (i.e. USBSS_3 and USBSS_4). The QMP PHYs for USB_0, USB_1 and USB_2
> > are actually powered by &vreg_l2j_1p2.
> >
> > Since most X1E device trees just mirror the power supplies from the
> > x1e80100-crd device tree, this series fixes up all the X1E boards with
> > the same change.
>
> Nice find! I've confirmed that this matches both the CRD and T14s
> schematics.
Can someone with access to the schematics confirm that the devkit
indeed has the same supplies?
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists