[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241211182958.5afc82c4@jic23-huawei>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 18:29:58 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, Lars-Peter
Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki"
<rafael@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] driver core: Split devres APIs to
device/devres.h
On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 02:45:46 +0200
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 08, 2024 at 05:10:01PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 Dec 2024 21:48:51 +0200
> > Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > device.h is a huge header which is hard to follow and easy to miss
> > > something. Improve that by splitting devres APIs to device/devres.h.
> > >
> > > In particular this helps to speedup the build of the code that includes
> > > device.h solely for a devres APIs.
>
> ...
>
> > > -#include <linux/overflow.h>
> > > +
> > Unrelated change.
>
> Which one? Blank line?
I think that's what I meant :) Was a trivial comment though.
>
> ...
>
> > > -#include <linux/cleanup.h>
> > This header movement is unrelated.
>
> No problem to let it stay at the same place.
>
> > I agree both are good but probably want to be a separate patch.
> >
> > Otherwise this seems sensible to me, but your cc list seems a little short!
> >
> > Greg and Rafael seems a good starting point so I've added them.
>
> Thanks! I need to check why they were not included into the original
> submission. Perhpas I need to amend MAINTAINERS,
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists