| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <202412210101.Og2hX0Rs-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2024 01:32:45 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Chen Ridong <chenridong@...weicloud.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mhocko@...e.com, hannes@...xchg.org, yosryahmed@...gle.com,
yuzhao@...gle.com, david@...hat.com, willy@...radead.org,
ryan.roberts@....com, baohua@...nel.org, 21cnbao@...il.com,
wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com
Cc: llvm@...ts.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chenridong@...wei.com,
wangweiyang2@...wei.com, xieym_ict@...mail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v5] mm: vmscan: retry folios written back while
isolated for traditional LRU
Hi Chen,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on akpm-mm/mm-everything]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Chen-Ridong/mm-vmscan-retry-folios-written-back-while-isolated-for-traditional-LRU/20241220-092147
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241220010931.3603111-1-chenridong%40huaweicloud.com
patch subject: [PATCH -next v5] mm: vmscan: retry folios written back while isolated for traditional LRU
config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-004-20241220 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241221/202412210101.Og2hX0Rs-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 19.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ab51eccf88f5321e7c60591c5546b254b6afab99)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241221/202412210101.Og2hX0Rs-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202412210101.Og2hX0Rs-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from mm/vmscan.c:30:
include/linux/mm_inline.h:47:41: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum node_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
47 | __mod_lruvec_state(lruvec, NR_LRU_BASE + lru, nr_pages);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~
include/linux/mm_inline.h:49:22: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
49 | NR_ZONE_LRU_BASE + lru, nr_pages);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~
In file included from mm/vmscan.c:42:
In file included from include/linux/migrate.h:8:
include/linux/hugetlb.h:1063:5: warning: no previous prototype for function 'replace_free_hugepage_folios' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
1063 | int replace_free_hugepage_folios(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
| ^
include/linux/hugetlb.h:1063:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
1063 | int replace_free_hugepage_folios(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
| ^
| static
>> mm/vmscan.c:313:29: error: call to undeclared function 'lru_gen_distance'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
313 | if (lru_gen_enabled() && !lru_gen_distance(folio, false))
| ^
mm/vmscan.c:442:51: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
442 | size += zone_page_state(zone, NR_ZONE_LRU_BASE + lru);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~
mm/vmscan.c:1806:4: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum vm_event_item' and 'enum zone_type') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
1806 | __count_zid_vm_events(PGSCAN_SKIP, zid, nr_skipped[zid]);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/vmstat.h:139:34: note: expanded from macro '__count_zid_vm_events'
139 | __count_vm_events(item##_NORMAL - ZONE_NORMAL + zid, delta)
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~
mm/vmscan.c:2330:51: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum node_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
2330 | inactive = lruvec_page_state(lruvec, NR_LRU_BASE + inactive_lru);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~
mm/vmscan.c:2331:49: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum node_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
2331 | active = lruvec_page_state(lruvec, NR_LRU_BASE + active_lru);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~
mm/vmscan.c:6271:3: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum vm_event_item' and 'enum zone_type') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
6271 | __count_zid_vm_events(ALLOCSTALL, sc->reclaim_idx, 1);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/vmstat.h:139:34: note: expanded from macro '__count_zid_vm_events'
139 | __count_vm_events(item##_NORMAL - ZONE_NORMAL + zid, delta)
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~
8 warnings and 1 error generated.
vim +/lru_gen_distance +313 mm/vmscan.c
285
286 /**
287 * find_folios_written_back - Find and move the written back folios to a new list.
288 * @list: filios list
289 * @clean: the written back folios list
290 * @is_retried: whether the list has already been retried.
291 */
292 static inline void find_folios_written_back(struct list_head *list,
293 struct list_head *clean, bool is_retried)
294 {
295 struct folio *folio;
296 struct folio *next;
297
298 list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(folio, next, list, lru) {
299 if (!folio_evictable(folio)) {
300 list_del(&folio->lru);
301 folio_putback_lru(folio);
302 continue;
303 }
304
305 /* retry folios that may have missed folio_rotate_reclaimable() */
306 if (!is_retried && !folio_test_active(folio) && !folio_mapped(folio) &&
307 !folio_test_dirty(folio) && !folio_test_writeback(folio)) {
308 list_move(&folio->lru, clean);
309 continue;
310 }
311
312 /* don't add rejected folios to the oldest generation */
> 313 if (lru_gen_enabled() && !lru_gen_distance(folio, false))
314 set_mask_bits(&folio->flags, LRU_REFS_FLAGS, BIT(PG_active));
315 }
316
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists