linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] lib: Remove dead code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2f7a83-67653280-a2f5-5cf12280@54008765>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 10:01:21 +0100
From: "Ariel Otilibili-Anieli" <Ariel.Otilibili-Anieli@...ecom.fr>
To: "Greg KH" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@...e.com>, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>, "Anthony PERARD" <anthony.perard@...es.tech>, "Michal Orzel" <michal.orzel@....com>, "Julien Grall" <julien@....org>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@...rix.com>, "Stefano Stabellini" <sstabellini@...nel.org>, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] lib: Remove dead code

On Friday, December 20, 2024 09:53 CET, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 09:44:31AM +0100, Ariel Otilibili-Anieli wrote:
> > On Friday, December 20, 2024 08:09 CET, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 11:45:01PM +0100, Ariel Otilibili wrote:
> > > > This is a follow up from a discussion in Xen:
> > > > 
> > > > The if-statement tests `res` is non-zero; meaning the case zero is never reached.
> > > > 
> > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/7587b503-b2ca-4476-8dc9-e9683d4ca5f0@suse.com/
> > > > Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
> > > > Suggested-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ariel Otilibili <ariel.otilibili-anieli@...ecom.fr>
> > > > --
> > > > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > > 
> > > Why is "removing dead code" a stable kernel thing?
> > 
> > Hello Greg,
> > 
> > It is what I understood from the process:
> > 
> > "Attaching a Fixes: tag does not subvert the stable kernel rules process nor the requirement to Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org on all stable patch candidates." [1]
> > 
> > Does my understanding make sense?
> 
> I'm confused, what are you expecting to happen here?  Why is this even
> marked as a "fix"?
> 
> > [1] https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html
> 
> Please read:
>     https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html

I am, Greg; thanks for the heads up.
> 
> for the stable kernel rules.
> 
> Again, you have a "cc: stable@..." in your patch, why?

Removed stable from the thread.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h